Szymon Kaliski

Understanding Through Building

  • building things has been my go-to way to gather deep understanding
    • implementing small demos of creative-coding ideas
    • implementing papers to be able to "interact" with them
    • building Realtalk-like system after visiting Dynamicland to better understand their decisions
    • building interactive sketches when exploring the solution space of a research problem
  • maybe part of the reason that it works, is that it forces effort (and Understanding Requires Effort), but I have an inkling that maybe there's something more here
  • I keep finding people who gather deep understanding about things by reading and immediately using what they read in some context - this doesn't seem to be always possible though, especially for abstract concepts
  • connections:

  • of course there's a Cybernetics lens on this, where acting generates knowing, and knowing, in turn, generates acting:

    A common preconception is that generally, understanding should precede acting and that theory is superior to practice (which depends on and is justified by theory), with post-rationalisation usually regarded as a shortcoming. In the context of radical constructivism, this preconception seems shortsighted: If acting generates understanding, and understanding, in turn, generates acting, the relationship of acting and doing can be described more appropriately as cyclical.

    — Christiane M. Herr - Design Cybernetics: Constructing Cybernetic Thinking, Design, and Education
  • this approach can be called "bricolage":

    Claude Levi-Strauss recognizes "bricolage", a "science of the concrete" (...) Bricoleurs construct theories by arranging and rearranging, by negotiating and renegotiating with a set of well-known materials.

    — Epistemological Pluralism - Styles and Voices within the Computer Culture - Sherry Turkle, Seymour Paper
  • there seems to be an overlap between building and publishing a lot, and being able to find work which allows for building more - another example of how Following Genuine Interests Forms Positive Feedback Loops:

    The sheer volume of your work is what works as a signal of weirdness, because anyone can do a one-off weird thing, but only volume can signal a consistently weird production sensibility that will inspire people betting on you. The energy evident in a body of work is the most honest signal about it that makes people trust you to do things for them.

    — Venkatesh Rao - The Breaking Smart AMA ↗

I probably err on the side of just making things happen... I get so much of a thrill bringing things to life... as soon as it comes to life it starts telling you what it is.

Dan Ingalls ↗

Backlinks

  1. 2024-04-05End-User Programming vs Programming1
  2. 2024-02-21Working with the Material1
  3. 2024-02-05Fidelity of The Tool Should be Proportional to The Maturity of The Idea1
  4. 2023-12-27Design Science Research2
  5. 2022-04-26Where Do Ideas Come From?1
  6. 2022-04-26Fixating on Solution Aesthetics can Lead to Solving Wrong Problems1
  7. 2022-01-18Feedback Loops in Research are Long1
  8. 2021-02-10Situated Cognition1
  9. 2021-02-07Knowledge Work Should Accrete1